Most Slavic languages are very curved, with the exception of Bulgarian and Macedonian. The agreement is similar to Latin, for example. B between adjectives and substants in sex, number, case and animacy (if considered a separate category). The following examples are taken from the serbo-croaculatic: in the case of verbs, a gender chord is less widespread, although it may still occur. In the French past, for example, the former work of the participants corresponds, in certain circumstances, to the subject or an object (for more details, see compound past). In Russian and most other Slavic languages, the form of the past in sex corresponds to the subject. A rare type of arrangement that phonologically copies parts of the head instead of agreeing with a grammatical category.  For example, in Bainouk: In this example, what is copied is not a prefix, but the beginning of the “river” head. There is also a consensus between pronouns and precursors. Examples of this can be found in English (although English pronouns mainly follow natural sex and not grammatical sex): In nomic sentences, adjectives do not show agreement with the noun, although pronouns do. z.B. a szép k-nyveitekkel “with your beautiful books” (“szép”: nice): the suffixes of the plural, the possessive “your” and the fall marking “with” are marked only on the name.
If you are struggling with problems in the subject verb contract, allow time to process your paper once by only for this error: Go through each sentence, highlight each subject and the verb couple and check that they agree. In Hungarian, verbs have a polypersonal concordance, which means that they correspond to more than one of the arguments of the verb: not only its subject, but also its object (accusative). There is a difference between the case where a particular object is present and the case where the object is indeterminate or if there is no object at all. (Adverbs have no influence on the form of the verb.) Examples: Szeretek (I love someone or something indeterminate), szeretem (I love him, she, or her, or her, specifically), szeretlek (I love you); szeret (he loves me, me, you, someone or something indeterminate), szereti (he loves him, her or her especially). Of course, names or pronouns can specify the exact object. In short, there is agreement between a verb and the person and the number of its subject and the specificity of its object (which often refers more or less precisely to the person). Languages cannot have a conventional agreement at all, as in Japanese or Malay; barely one, as in English; a small amount, as in spoken French; a moderate amount, such as in Greek or Latin; or a large quantity, as in Swahili. Such a concordance is also found with predictors: man is tall (“man is great”) vs. the chair is large (“the chair is large”). (In some languages, such as German.
B, that is not the case; only the attribute modifiers show the agreement.) A question with whom or what takes a singular verb. The agreement generally includes the matching of the value of a grammatical category between different elements of a sentence (or sometimes between sentences, as in some cases where a pronoun agrees with its predecessor or its reference opinion). Some categories that often trigger grammatical chords are listed below. In English, the defective verbs usually show no agreement for the person or the number, they contain the modal verbs: can, can, can, must, should, should.